'A' Level Economists: Evaluation techniques

Some brief advice on getting higher evaluation marks


Evaluation questions carry the highest marks and ask for more from the student. For the AQA evaluation marks are reserved for the final essay-style question. But for EdExcel, evaluation marks are available in more questions – summarised below:

For students taking EdExcel Unit 1: From January 2011 there is a standard formula for evaluation:

• 6 from 14 marks

• 4 from 10 or 12 marks

• 2 from 8 marks

• 2 from 6 marks

• Evaluation may be spread across three or four of the five sub-questions in the data response.

Here are some thoughts from the examiners

(i) Before you can evaluate you must analyse!

(ii) Evaluate each argument as it is introduced into the answer

(iii) Examiners like students who develop clear chains of reasoning in their answers

(iv) Try to make at least 3 “explicit” references to the data given in the question

(v) “Answers do not always have a clear, logical structure”.

Hints for better marks:

a. Your answer should be around 2 sides in length, including diagrams

b. Identify the area of economics which is being tested in the essay-style question

c. Outline the relevant theory, using a diagram if possible (they really do help!)

d. Evaluate arguments/policies as you go
e. Develop one key point/argument per paragraph (no more) and leave a clear line between each paragraph
f. Remember to come to a ‘final judgement’ including referring back to the data
g. A conclusion is essential and should not just repeat earlier points.
h. Leave yourself 5 minutes for a final judgement of 4-5 lines. This is time well spent. Try to incorporate a new idea, e.g. how a policy may impact on different parties; how the policy may have different short v long run effects

Recent exam reports offer good advice on how to finish an evaluative essay strongly:
• Answers should include alternative points of view and these should be clearly identified

• Some attempt should be made to consider the strengths and weaknesses of the different viewpoints. [Rank them if possible]

• Where possible, use data to provide support for arguments or to refute a point of view

• Final judgements might be qualified by statements that include phrases such as ‘it depends on’.

• Useful evaluative words: “However, nevertheless, it is likely that, on the other hand….”

• Maintain a high quality of presentation, especially in high mark questions and with your diagrams