Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label competition policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label competition policy. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 January 2019

Competition Policy 2019

Why does the government intervene in markets to maintain competition?
Students should be able to:
  • Explain and evaluate measures aimed at enhancing competition between firms and their impact on prices, output and market structure.
  • Compare and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of methods of regulation for example price capping, monitoring of prices and performance targets.



Competition Policy In Action from tutor2u


Paper 3 - June 15 (old spec, but essays require same process)

09        Explain how the determination of prices & output by oligopolists is affected not only by the reactions of their customers, but also by their interdependence with other producers.
(15 Marks)

10        The European commission prevents mobile phone networks from colluding on ‘roaming charges’ when consumers travel around Europe. Meanwhile, the EU has forced mobile phone manufacturers to cooperate in making a single design of a phone charger.
Evaluate the view that governments should never intervene to influence how oligopolists collude or cooperate on such issues as fixing prices, varying output, conducting research, developing products, or carrying out any other aspect of their business.
(25 Marks)

Saturday, 20 January 2018

UK Competition Policy - 2018 Update

We will be using this in the lessons this week....

Wednesday, 24 February 2016

Unit 3: Competition policy - Presentation

Why does the government intervene in markets to maintain competition?
You should be able to:
  • Explain and evaluate measures aimed at enhancing competition between firms and their impact on prices, output and market structure.
  • Compare and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of methods of regulation for example price capping, monitoring of prices and performance targets.

Saturday, 31 October 2015

Unit 3: Mergers and Acquisitions in the News

Click on the links below to access topical examples of mergers, acquisitions and de-mergers in the fast-moving world of business growth and integration. Excellent material and potential questions for the June 2016 examination.

Takeover of Morrisons

Are big mergers bad for consumers?

Poundland and 99p Stores

Shell buys BG group

Southwest Water and Bournemouth merge

Beer Giants merge


Monday, 15 September 2014

Unit 3: UK Competition Policy

Click here to read a relatively short, if rather dull notice from the government explaining UK Competition Policy. You are asked about this EVERY year and have to include a decent definition. Recently the government merged the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission, to form the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA).



Please take a few minutes to read. I will ask you about it in class this week!

Sunday, 31 August 2014

Unit 3: Ofwat curbs price rises

Here is an important example of regulatory control of utility businesses with regional natural monopoly power. Ofwat is requiring regional water companies to cut their bills in real terms for the next five year pricing regime.

Regulatory agencies are often accused of failing to be sufficient strong with suppliers leading to allegations of regulatory capture i.e. producer interests dominate consumer interests. Ofwat may be an example of a regulator that avoids this criticism.

Click here for the article from BBC news

Questions for discussion:

Why does the water industry need regulation?
Are there any disadvantages to the consumer of govt intervention?

Thursday, 7 March 2013

Unit 3: Anti-Competitive Practices - they are still at it - Allegedly!

Microsoft fined by European Commission over web browser



Click here to access a recent article regarding Microsoft. Despite previous fines it looks like they are still unfairly competing in the web browser market.

Questions for discussion:

Do you think the CC is being too harsh? (have Microsoft not invested heavily in browser technology and therefore should be allowed to promote only their own brand?)

Were the initial fines big enough to discourage anticompetitive practices?